The constitutional provisions for constitutional amendment make it highly unlikely that small states will lose their formal powers -- at some stage, change requires consent of 2/3 of state legislatures or U.S. senators.
Also, the census of 1790 showed a population of 3.9 million, making it unlikely that the 1787 population was 2 million.
The constitutional provisions for constitutional amendment make it highly unlikely than small states will lose their formal powers -- at some stage, change requires consent of 2/3 of state legislatures or U.S. senators.
Also, the census of 1790 showed a population of 3.9 million, making it unlikely that the 1787 population was 2 million.
Everything is broken and nothing matters anymore
Thank you for mentioning we should add states.
The constitutional provisions for constitutional amendment make it highly unlikely that small states will lose their formal powers -- at some stage, change requires consent of 2/3 of state legislatures or U.S. senators.
Also, the census of 1790 showed a population of 3.9 million, making it unlikely that the 1787 population was 2 million.
The constitutional provisions for constitutional amendment make it highly unlikely than small states will lose their formal powers -- at some stage, change requires consent of 2/3 of state legislatures or U.S. senators.
Also, the census of 1790 showed a population of 3.9 million, making it unlikely that the 1787 population was 2 million.